Login
Tag Cloud
2009 summer institute area of concern art attitude challenges citizen discussions civic engagement Classroom Discussions collaboration communication skills conceptual possibilities consensus contrasting possibilities conversations creativity deliberation democracy developing questions dimensions discovery discussion process Discussion Reports educational implications embeddedness ethics facilitation facilitation assignments first year seminar generating possibilities generosity governance Guiding Student Performance higher education innovation learning by doing note-taking participation pedagogy personal development Project Discussions Public Discussions reasoning skills recruiting shy participants small groups social skills specialists student-centered discussion student evaluation student success syllabus Yes andArchives
- ▼2010 (58)
- ▼March (14)
- When process is the content...
- Interventions and Uncertainty
- ADD Nation?
- Finally, in the loop again!
- Student-Centered Discussion: Providing Structured Space for Critical Thinking
- Integrating Course Content
- What Roles Do “Specialists” Play in IF Project Discussions?
- Half Time
- Recruiting for Public Discussions: Use Groups, Don’t Create Them
- Exploration, Development, and Debate
- Confessions of a Failed IF Blogger...
- Practical Tips for Citizen Discussion of Possibilities: Part III-Managing and Wrapping Up a Discussion
- Citizen Discussions FAQs
- Integrating Course Content?
- ▶February (25)
- Let the Chaos Begin!
- Expense Forms - for IF sponsored classes and for citizen discussions
- Guiding and Assessing student facilitation
- Lessons from Citizens Concerning "Starting Points" in Discussion
- Integrating Discussion into a New Course
- A Quick Word About Peer Evaluation
- Assessing Student Performance
- Think Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)...
- Addressing students who complain, "What can I learn from these other students?"
- How are you guiding and assessing student performance in discussion?
- Practical Tips for Citizen Discussion of Possibilities: Part II- Starting the Discussion
- Guiding Student Performance
- What Is the Difference Between Conceptual and Practical Policy Possibilities?
- Picking at the Glue and Possibilities for Innovation
- Snacks
- Putting Chicken Little in His Place
- Some Thoughts on Recruiting Panels for the Best Contrast of Possibilities
- Why Spend Time in Public Discussion on “Concepts”?
- What is Possible about a Policy Possibility?
- Front-End Deliberation
- Reflections on last semester
- Practical Tips for Citizen Discussions: Part 1-Recruitment
- What Makes for a Good Citizen Discussion?
- What Is the Difference Between a Problem and an Area of Concern?
- Two Cheers for the Disciplines
- ▶January (19)
- Embedding Deliberation in Professional Practice
- Evaluation Rubrics (forms) for Student Facilitators and Group
- Good Nervous
- Setting up student groups
- First Two Weeks and Student Groups
- Setting Groups in Motion
- Why Contrasting Possibilities?
- Making the Town Hall Work
- How are you setting up your student discussion groups?
- Seeing Ourselves From the Outside
- What Impact Does the IF Approach Have on Faculty?
- Setting up student groups
- First two weeks
- Embedding Deliberation in Government
- Learning and the IF Discussion Process
- Public Discussion: We’ve All Done It Before
- Why We Do Not Try to Forge a Consensus Among Our Panelists?
- The Ethical Dimensions of Deliberation
- Jobs and the Future of a College Education?
- ▼March (14)
- ▶2009 (59)
- ▶December (3)
- ▶November (10)
- ▶October (8)
- ▶September (7)
- ▶August (6)
- ▶July (12)
- Lauren's Story
- Trying Out Citizen Discussions
- What We've Learned from Citizen Discussion
- Diversifying Social Skills, Ryan's Story
- Other Things to Do in Madison
- Summer Institute Activities: Educational Connections
- The Story of Thomas, Developing Social Confidence
- Our Activities at the Summer Institute
- Travel Planning & Other Logistics
- Exploring Consequences to Revise Possibilities
- (More than) 36 Hours in Madison, Wisconsin
- Taking a Conceptual Approach?
- ▶June (9)
- ▶May (2)
- ▶April (2)
- ▼2010 (58)
Contributors
Citizen Discussions FAQs
Numerous questions have arisen regarding the nuts and bolts of planning for and then conducting a citizen discussion. Theses discussion can seem rather daunting, particularly if engaging in community discussions is outside of your experiential range. So far, Jack has done a couple of these, Matt has done one, and Maria is planning one. I have done quite a few citizen discussion, as has Dennis (who has done more than any of us has and who has also trained many people to facilitate these discussions). Adolf has been doing several of these discussions since moving to Boston and is becoming quite adept at working with an existing organization to plan a citizen discussion. Everyone that does one citizen discussion nearly always goes on to facilitate others. There is something really energizing about conducting a discussion with fellow citizens who are participating simply because they are interested in (or want to learn more about) the topic, and so we hope that you will consider doing one of these discussions (it may understandably be easier to do one in the summer).
Within the materials you received in Madison was a guidebook to conducting citizen discussions. This has lots of useful information. Dennis and I have also posted on-the-ground pointers to the Perspectives Blog (here on the IF site) based upon our experience. Mine is essentially a “kick-start” guide, and Dennis’ is more a nuts and bolts troubleshooting tool. I would also encourage you to talk with your fellow faculty who have done or are planning a discussion.
A few specifics on planning for and reporting upon these discussions:
(1) I will be serving as the reporting conduit for these discussions, as they are conducted by faculty. Since I already interact with each of you quite extensively with regard to your courses, this seemed the most expedient approach. Please send me a quick email if you are planning to conduct a discussion. Tell me when you plan to do the discussion, how many people will attend, and where I should send the discussion reports. I am happy to help you sort out any concerns or questions you might have, but feel free to discuss those with anyone that might be about to help guide you. Just be sure to send me the basic plan so that I know you are doing the discussion and can get the necessary materials to you.
(2) As you conduct your discussions, be sure to save receipts for your group’s meals, etc. At the end of the discussion (or on a rolling basis, if necessary), you should use the form that Pete posted to request reimbursement for your expenses.
(3) When you have finished your discussion, please ask your participants to complete the participant debriefing survey on Survey Monkey (Link: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/BVV52ZR). We also ask that you, as the facilitator, complete the facilitator debriefing survey at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/R2G9JT9. Finally, we ask that you write a short “impressions” summary of the discussion– what was interesting, what did you and/or participants seem to get out of the discussion, what (if any) stumbling blocks did you hit, how engaging were the possibilities, would you do it again, etc. It might be easiest to make a few notes at the end of each meeting and then write these up at the end of the discussion. We ask some of the questions you might address in your final summary in our facilitator debriefing, but we find that having facilitators put their experiences into their own words tells us things we might not even have thought to ask. You should send this summary narrative to me at email hidden; JavaScript is required.
(4) Once you have completed the reporting, I will request that the Parkersburg office send you the $1000 honorarium we offer in compensation to our facilitators for their time and efforts.
Even if you are not planning to do a discussion until summer, it would be terrific if you could let me know your target start date– just so we know what everyone might be planning. If you find that you enjoy doing these discussions, you are welcome to do as many as you would like (some ‘06 faculty have done several and continue to do more).
Best, Sue
PS– You and your participants will need a passcode when using the Survey Monkey system, so that we can keep data sorted by discussion, facilitator, and topic. On November 2, 2009, I sent an email, “Using Survey Monkey for Citizen Discussion Debriefings– For Facilitators,” to all of you. It has instructions as to what your passcode ID is and how to determine the specifics of the passcode for each of your discussions. If you no longer have this email, please let me know and I will resend it to you. Thanks, Sue
Share: