Category Archives: Perspectives

False Dichotomies and the IF Discussion Process

While on a recent family vacation, I had the “opportunity” to watch a couple hours of cable TV news/commentary.  By which I mean that I lost the coin toss with my spouse over which of us would accompany our over-excited children to the hotel pool, where a steady and loud stream of cable news was Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

What makes IF reports unique?

First, IF reports neither make recommendations nor aim for consensus. Most of the public policy reports produced today end with a list of things that must be done to avert Armageddon. It is true that IF reports often include lists of ‘possible implementations’, but they are—as the title suggests—mere illustrations of how a conceptual possibility Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

Development of Possibilities in “Difficult” Policy Areas

Despite warnings from colleagues and apoplectic reactions from partisans of various stripes, I have been working during the last year to see if it is possible to develop general starting points for discussion of climate change. These efforts first came together as I followed an informal group engaged in study and discussion of what might Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

The Uses of Diversity

“Diversity” no longer means what it did to my parents’ generation.  Rather than simple “variety” the word now means something more like “a mixture of important social categories”—hence the demand that we “Respect diversity” means something like “Recognize the importance of social categories.” When it comes to exploratory discussion, there are good reasons to pay Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

A Fractal View of Exploratory Discussion

A fractal is a unique kind of fraction—one that reproduces the form or shape of the thing it’s a part of.  Since the concept was first described, fractals have been found in lots of places, some of them quite unexpected.  Here’s another one: exploratory democratic discussion. One of the most widely appreciated rules of public Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

It’s the Facilitator

When you think back on key moments in your life, what would you say has influenced your development more—special books, or special persons?  When you think back on high school or college, which do you remember more—a particular class or a particular book you read?  Which do you turn to most frequently when you need Read more »
Also posted in Education | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

Truth and Consequences

Remember the old kids’ game Truth or Consequences?  IF’s exploratory discussions don’t allow participants to get off the hook by choosing one or another.  On the contrary, they put participants in the position of exploring what they really believe—that’s the “truth” part—and the consequences of their beliefs. What ties these together? —Values, purposes, aims, goals, Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

IF Discussion Reports as Lightweight Batons

IF’s public discussion Reports are akin to the curricular materials that all teachers rely on—with two critical differences.  First, citizens–no less than experts—have a say in what IF Reports say.  Second, and even more importantly, the end of IF Reports is to serve as an object of exploratory group discussion rather than individual study. This Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

Possibilities and Exploratory Discussion

Some people wonder why IF’s discussions focus on possibilities for public policy. The term “possibility” underlines the openended-ness of public policy and the reality that discussing and making public policy both require choice.  Still, the real reason for thinking about and discussing public policy in terms of possibilities is that it encourages exploration.  And, because Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

Being a River Guide

I have often struggled to better explain how the Interactivity Foundation conceives of the role and function of a facilitator in our discussion projects.  My incoherence probably derives from a couple reasons (at least and in addition to my usual cognitive limitations).  First, “facilitation” is at best a general term and a skill that encompasses Read more »
Posted in Perspectives | Tagged | Leave a comment

Share:

| More

Sitemap

Interactivity Foundation

  • PO Box 9
  • Parkersburg, WV 26102-0009
  • ph 304-424-3605
  • FAX 304-485-8218
  • email hidden; JavaScript is required