Login
Tag Cloud
2009 summer institute area of concern art attitude challenges citizen discussions civic engagement Classroom Discussions collaboration communication skills conceptual possibilities consensus contrasting possibilities conversations creativity deliberation democracy developing questions dimensions discovery discussion process Discussion Reports educational implications embeddedness ethics facilitation facilitation assignments first year seminar generating possibilities generosity governance Guiding Student Performance higher education innovation learning by doing note-taking participation pedagogy personal development Project Discussions Public Discussions reasoning skills recruiting shy participants small groups social skills specialists student-centered discussion student evaluation student success syllabus Yes andArchives
- ▼2010 (58)
- ▼March (14)
- When process is the content...
- Interventions and Uncertainty
- ADD Nation?
- Finally, in the loop again!
- Student-Centered Discussion: Providing Structured Space for Critical Thinking
- Integrating Course Content
- What Roles Do “Specialists” Play in IF Project Discussions?
- Half Time
- Recruiting for Public Discussions: Use Groups, Don’t Create Them
- Exploration, Development, and Debate
- Confessions of a Failed IF Blogger...
- Practical Tips for Citizen Discussion of Possibilities: Part III-Managing and Wrapping Up a Discussion
- Citizen Discussions FAQs
- Integrating Course Content?
- ▶February (25)
- Let the Chaos Begin!
- Expense Forms - for IF sponsored classes and for citizen discussions
- Guiding and Assessing student facilitation
- Lessons from Citizens Concerning "Starting Points" in Discussion
- Integrating Discussion into a New Course
- A Quick Word About Peer Evaluation
- Assessing Student Performance
- Think Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)...
- Addressing students who complain, "What can I learn from these other students?"
- How are you guiding and assessing student performance in discussion?
- Practical Tips for Citizen Discussion of Possibilities: Part II- Starting the Discussion
- Guiding Student Performance
- What Is the Difference Between Conceptual and Practical Policy Possibilities?
- Picking at the Glue and Possibilities for Innovation
- Snacks
- Putting Chicken Little in His Place
- Some Thoughts on Recruiting Panels for the Best Contrast of Possibilities
- Why Spend Time in Public Discussion on “Concepts”?
- What is Possible about a Policy Possibility?
- Front-End Deliberation
- Reflections on last semester
- Practical Tips for Citizen Discussions: Part 1-Recruitment
- What Makes for a Good Citizen Discussion?
- What Is the Difference Between a Problem and an Area of Concern?
- Two Cheers for the Disciplines
- ▶January (19)
- Embedding Deliberation in Professional Practice
- Evaluation Rubrics (forms) for Student Facilitators and Group
- Good Nervous
- Setting up student groups
- First Two Weeks and Student Groups
- Setting Groups in Motion
- Why Contrasting Possibilities?
- Making the Town Hall Work
- How are you setting up your student discussion groups?
- Seeing Ourselves From the Outside
- What Impact Does the IF Approach Have on Faculty?
- Setting up student groups
- First two weeks
- Embedding Deliberation in Government
- Learning and the IF Discussion Process
- Public Discussion: We’ve All Done It Before
- Why We Do Not Try to Forge a Consensus Among Our Panelists?
- The Ethical Dimensions of Deliberation
- Jobs and the Future of a College Education?
- ▼March (14)
- ▶2009 (59)
- ▶December (3)
- ▶November (10)
- ▶October (8)
- ▶September (7)
- ▶August (6)
- ▶July (12)
- Lauren's Story
- Trying Out Citizen Discussions
- What We've Learned from Citizen Discussion
- Diversifying Social Skills, Ryan's Story
- Other Things to Do in Madison
- Summer Institute Activities: Educational Connections
- The Story of Thomas, Developing Social Confidence
- Our Activities at the Summer Institute
- Travel Planning & Other Logistics
- Exploring Consequences to Revise Possibilities
- (More than) 36 Hours in Madison, Wisconsin
- Taking a Conceptual Approach?
- ▶June (9)
- ▶May (2)
- ▶April (2)
- ▼2010 (58)
Contributors
What is Possible about a Policy Possibility?
One of IF’s ongoing tasks is to find the most useful scale and tone for the possibilities in its reports. While we have learned a great deal about how to present possibilities and discuss them, we are still grappling with a number of questions about the relation of our work product to our goal of citizen discussion.
We have a sense that we want something more tangible than broad ways of thinking about a policy area and something less specific and detailed than one might find at the governmental level. The whole point is to stimulate discussion so that citizens have some contrasting starting points that get their civic juices flowing and, perhaps, prompt some thinking beyond the possibilities mentioned in our reports.
It is almost a given that there is no one right way to accomplish these conversation-starter tasks. Do we want citizens to think totally outside the box? Do we chiefly want this to be an imaginative exercise wherein they can reinvent society according to different visions? Or do we want practical possibilities that might aid organizational development and systems design in the here and now?
In answering these questions for myself I go back to the idea that we are providing starting points for discussion. It might be better to think in terms of pump-priming or even accelerant than concrete policy options. In that view, might not a rather fanciful, but provocative, possibility serve as a better stimulant to citizen discussion than the more obvious elements of conventional wisdom?
It may also be helpful to consider our efforts in light of our current civic malaise where what seems “possible” is so shrunken and pitiful that is almost embarrassing to realize that we are a nation that produced great movements for the abolition of slavery, worker’s rights, civil rights, and environmental protection. In such cases rigid and unyielding conventional wisdom (sometimes backed by legal institutions and armed force) made some visions seem impossible. Yet is it not possible to look back and find those who imagined different possibilities and think of them as visionaries and heroes?
Possibilities can unleash the wisdom of the citizenry and allow the unimaginable to become quite imaginable and imperative. And they can later seem so obvious that today we can wonder what all the fuss was about.
Still, there is a role for sorting out different citizen discussion tracks that deal more with the short-term and the practical. Some citizens may want to envision a different society and others may want to focus on thinking about transit and land use in a particular community now. And there may be ways for the needs and desire of one constituency to mesh with the other.
So it is entirely possible that our possibilities will need to be matched to specific discussion settings and groups. Our possibilities may need to be calibrated in some settings, contrasting as apples and oranges in others, and as asymmetrical as apples, wrenches, and goats in yet others. In the citizen discussion environment we will come to know the answer to these questions only through more practice and citizen feedback.
Share: