Tag Archives: conceptual possibilities

Possibilities as Catalysts to Discussion

Within the Interactivity Foundation, and as part of our continuing and internal development, we frequently discuss how to make our conceptual possibilities more “useful” for public discussion. And related to that ongoing discussion, we’ve had a number of recent postings… Read More »

Posted in Perspectives | Also tagged , , | Comments closed

Share:

| More

What’s a Conceptual Policy Possibility?

Interactivity Foundation Project Discussions aim at generating contrasting conceptual policy possibilities with the hopes of expanding and enriching public thinking about a complex area of social and political concern. You might think of a “policy” as providing a sort of… Read More »

Posted in Education | Also tagged , , , | Comments closed

Share:

| More

What makes IF reports unique?

First, IF reports neither make recommendations nor aim for consensus. Most of the public policy reports produced today end with a list of things that must be done to avert Armageddon. It is true that IF reports often include lists… Read More »

Posted in Perspectives | Also tagged , | Comments closed

Share:

| More

Development of Possibilities in “Difficult” Policy Areas

Despite warnings from colleagues and apoplectic reactions from partisans of various stripes, I have been working during the last year to see if it is possible to develop general starting points for discussion of climate change. These efforts first came… Read More »

Posted in Perspectives | Also tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Share:

| More

IF Discussion Reports as Lightweight Batons

IF’s public discussion Reports are akin to the curricular materials that all teachers rely on—with two critical differences.  First, citizens–no less than experts—have a say in what IF Reports say.  Second, and even more importantly, the end of IF Reports… Read More »

Posted in Perspectives | Also tagged , , , | Comments closed

Share:

| More

CONCEPTUAL CHECKLIST–For Reference During Sanctuary Projects

IF Fellows maintain a more-or-less continual conversation about how to improve sanctuary projects so that they produce Public Discussion Reports better able to spur truly exploratory public discussions.  A perennial focus of our discussions is with making sure that the… Read More »

Posted in Perspectives | Also tagged , , | Comments closed

Share:

| More

Sitemap

Interactivity Foundation

  • PO Box 9
  • Parkersburg, WV 26102-0009
  • ph 304-424-3605
  • FAX 304-485-8218
  • email hidden; JavaScript is required